Coherence 1990
<Previous :: Coherence Index :: Next>

BÄCKLUND, I. «To sum up. Initial infinitives as cues to the reader», in G. Caie [et al.] (eds), Proceedings from the fourth Nordic conference for English studies. Helsingør, May 11-13, 1989, Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.

BAMBERG, M. & MARCHMAN, V. «What holds a narrative together? The linguistic encoding of episode boundaries», Papers in Pragmatics 4: 58-121.

BLACK, N. «Cohesión y prominencia en el discurso del quechua del norte de Junin», Lenguas Modernas 17: 93-110.

BROEK, P. van den «Causal inferences and the comprehension of narrative texts7, in A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (eds), Inferences and text comprehension, San Diego: Academic Press.

COEHLO, C. A. ; LILES, B. Z. & DUFFY, R. J. «Contextual influences on narrative discourse in normal young adults», Journal  of Psycholinguist Research 19-6 : 405-420.

COLOMBO, L. & WILLIAMS, J. «Effects of word- and sentence- level contexts upon word recognition», Memory and Cognition 18-2 : 153-163.

CONNOR, U. & JOHNS, A, M. (eds) Coherence in writing. Research and pedagogical perspectives, Alexandria: TESOL.

CONTE, M. E.  «Pronominale Anaphern im Text», Rivista di Linguistica 2: 141-154.

CREWE, W. «The illogic of logical connectives», ELT Journal 44: 316-325.

DANES, F. «On stylistic relevance of the choice of anaphoric expressions», Rivista di Linguistica 2: 121-139 (special issue on Anaphoric relations in sentence and text).

DORVAL, B (ed.) Conversational organization and its development, Norwood : Ablex.

ERICKSON, F. «The social construction of discourse coherence in a family dinner table conversation», in B. Dorval (ed.), Conversational organization and its development, Norwood: Ablex, 207-238.

FODOR, J. & McLAUGHLIN, B. P. «Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: why Smolensky's solution doesn't work», Cognition 35-2 : 183-204.

GERNSBACHER, M. A. Language comprehension as structure building, Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

GILLARD, L. Les problèmes de coherence rencontrés dans les écrits d’anglo-américains, Mémoire de DEA, Université de Nantes.

GRAESSEER, A. (ed.) Conceptual coherence in text and ciscourse, Symposium conducted at the 12th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cambridge, MA.

GREEGG, N. & HOY, C. «Referencing : the cohesive use of pronouns in the written narrative of college underprepared writers, nondisabled writers, and writers with learning disabilities», Journal of Learning Disabilities 23-9 : 557-563.

GRIFFITH, P. L.; RIPICH, D. N. & DASTOLI, S. „Narrative abilities in hearing-impaired children: propositions and cohesion“, American Annals of the Deaf 135-&: 14-21.

GROSZ, B. J. & SIDNER, C. L. «Plans for discourse», in P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan & M.E. Pollack (eds), Intentions in communication, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 417-444.

HOBBS, J. «Topic drift», in B. Dorval (ed.), Conversational organization and its development, Norwood: Ablex, 3-22.

HOBBS, J. Literature and cognition, Menlo Park: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

HOVY, E. H. «Parsimonious and profligate approaches to the question of discourse structure relations», in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, 128-136.

HOVY, E. H. «Approaches to the planning of coherent text», in C. Paris, W.L. Swartout & W. C. Mann (eds), Natural language in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics, Boston: Kluwer, 83-102.

KREUZ, R. J. & ROBERTS, R. M. «The elements of conversational coherence», in A. Graesser (ed.), Conceptual coherence in text and discourse. Symposium conducted at the 12th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cambridge, MA.

LAUTAMATTI, L. «Coherence in spoken and written discourse», in U. Connor & A. M. Johns (eds), Coherence in writing. Research and pedagogical perspectives, Alexandria: TESOL, 29-40.

McCAGG, P. «Toward understanding coherence: a response proposition taxonomy», in Coherence in writing: research and pedagogical perspectives, Alexandria, VA: TESOL, 111-130.

PARSONS, G. Cohesion and coherence: scientific texts – A comparative study, Nottingham: University of Nottingham.

PECK, C. W. «Readable technical paragraphs», Notes on Linguistics 49: 7-30.

REDEKER, G. «Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure», Journal of Pragmatics 14: 367-381.

RUMBLE, S. & MALAN, K. «The development of a framework for assessing developing conversation skills», The South African Journal of Communication Disorders. Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings 37: 21-26.

SCHEGLOFF, E. A. «On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction», in B. Dorval (ed.), Conversational organization and its development, Norwood: Ablex, 51-78.

SHEPPARD, W. D. & BOYER, R. W. «Pretrial EEG cohrence as a predictor of semantic priming effets», Brain and Language 39-1 : 57-68.

TANNEN, D. «Gender differences in topical coherence: creating involvement in best friends’ talk», Discourse Processes 13: 73-90.

TANNEN, D. «Gender differences in conversational coherence: physical alignment and topical cohesion», in B. Dorval (ed.), Conversational organization and its development. Norwood: Ablex, 167-206.

Last modified: 21/01/2013

Please forward questions, comments or suggestions to: Dr. Hélène Perdicoyianni-Paléologou, E-Mail: hperpal@hotmail.com